SMART Goals: The Method, Its Limits, and When You Should (Not) Use It
"I want to exercise more this year." Sounds good, never happens.
"I want to jog for 30 minutes three times a week by June 30th." Much better.
The difference? The second goal is SMART. But is SMART always the best method? Spoiler: No. This guide shows you when SMART works, when it doesn't – and what alternatives exist.
What Does SMART Mean?
SMART is an acronym for five criteria a goal should meet:
| Letter | Meaning | Core Question |
|---|---|---|
| S | Specific | What exactly do I want to achieve? |
| M | Measurable | How will I know I've achieved it? |
| A | Achievable | Is it attainable and worthwhile? |
| R | Relevant | Is it doable and important? |
| T | Time-bound | By when do I want to achieve it? |
The History
The SMART method was introduced in 1981 by George T. Doran in his paper "There's a S.M.A.R.T. Way to Write Management's Goals and Objectives." Originally developed for management goals, it became the standard in almost all areas – from corporate management to project management to personal development.
Formulating SMART Goals: Step by Step
S – Specific
Bad: "I want to become a better programmer."
SMART: "I want to master TypeScript well enough to independently develop type-safe APIs."
Questions for specification:
- What exactly do I want to achieve?
- Who is involved?
- Where does it take place?
- What resources do I need?
- Why is this goal important?
M – Measurable
Bad: "Acquire more customers."
SMART: "Acquire 20 new paying customers."
Making things measurable:
| Vague | Measurable |
|---|---|
| More revenue | 15% revenue increase |
| Better code quality | Test coverage of 80% |
| Faster delivery | Deployment time under 10 minutes |
| Higher customer satisfaction | NPS score above 50 |
Tip: If you can't find an obvious measure, ask: "How would an outsider recognize that I achieved the goal?"
A – Achievable
The "A" is interpreted differently:
Attractive:
- Does this goal motivate me?
- Do I really want to achieve it?
- Does it align with my values?
Achievable:
- Do I have the necessary resources?
- Is it within my sphere of influence?
- Is it technically possible?
Example – Test:
- ❌ "I want to become a billionaire" – Outside sphere of influence
- ✅ "I want to reach €100,000 annual revenue" – Challenging but achievable
R – Relevant
Two interpretations here as well:
Realistic:
- Is the goal achievable under given circumstances?
- Do I have the time, skills, and resources?
Relevant:
- Does this goal contribute to my larger goals?
- Is now the right time?
- Does it align with company strategy?
The Relevance Check:
Company goal: Become market leader in B2B SaaS
Department goal: 50% faster feature development
→ Relevant? Yes, enables faster market adaptation
Department goal: Renovate office
→ Relevant? No, doesn't contribute to main goal
T – Time-bound
Bad: "Launch the app sometime."
SMART: "Publish the app in the App Store by March 15, 2026."
Types of time binding:
| Type | Example | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Deadline | By December 31, 2026 | Projects with fixed end |
| Time period | Within 3 months | Flexible projects |
| Frequency | Every Monday | Routines and habits |
| Milestones | Phase 1 by March, Phase 2 by June | Large projects |
SMART Goals Examples by Area
Software Development
| Vague | SMART |
|---|---|
| Improve code | Reduce technical debt by 30% by Q2, measured by SonarQube issues |
| Deploy faster | Optimize CI/CD pipeline so deployments take under 5 minutes by end of March |
| Test more | Increase test coverage from 45% to 75% by end of Q1 |
Career
| Vague | SMART |
|---|---|
| Get promoted | Be promoted to Senior Developer by December 2026 by meeting defined criteria X, Y, Z |
| Earn more | Achieve at least 10% raise in next salary negotiation (June) |
| Find new job | Have three interviews at companies on my wish list by end of Q2 |
Team Leadership
| Vague | SMART |
|---|---|
| Improve team morale | Improve team NPS from 6 to 8 by end of Q3 |
| Less turnover | Reduce voluntary resignation rate from 20% to under 10% by year end |
| Better communication | Introduce weekly 1:1s with all team members, starting next week |
Personal Development
| Vague | SMART |
|---|---|
| Learn a language | Reach B1 level in Spanish by December, verified by DELE certificate |
| Read more | Read at least 24 books in 2026 (2 per month) |
| Live healthier | Lose 5kg by June through 3x weekly training and calorie deficit |
The Criticism of SMART Goals
SMART isn't perfect. Here are the legitimate criticisms:
1. Promotes Risk Avoidance
Because goals should be "achievable" and "realistic," people often set goals too low. The result: mediocrity is rewarded.
Problem:
- Team sets goal: 10% growth
- Team achieves 10% → Success celebrated
- Team might have achieved 30%
2. Short-term Thinking
Time binding often leads to:
- Focus on quick wins instead of sustainable solutions
- "Gaming the metrics" – hitting the number even if that's not the real goal
- Neglecting long-term investments
Example: Sales team focuses on quarterly goals, neglects long-term customer relationships.
3. Not Suitable for Uncertainty
In VUCA environments (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, Ambiguity), rigid goals work poorly:
- Startup world: Goals change constantly
- Innovation: Success isn't plannable
- Complex projects: Unknown unknowns
4. Measurement Obsession
Not everything important is measurable. The focus on measurability leads to:
- Neglecting quality (only quantity is measurable)
- Overemphasis on what gets measured
- Manipulation of metrics
Campbell's Law: "The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor."
5. Lack of Inspiration
SMART goals are rational but not necessarily inspiring. "20% revenue increase by Q4" motivates less than "We want to revolutionize the way people work."
Alternatives to SMART Goals
OKRs (Objectives and Key Results)
Structure:
- Objective: Qualitative, inspiring goal
- Key Results: 3-5 measurable outcomes showing if the goal was achieved
Example:
Objective: Provide the best onboarding experience in the industry
Key Results:
- Time-to-value under 5 minutes
- Onboarding completion rate above 90%
- NPS for new users above 60
- Support tickets in first week under 5%
Advantages over SMART:
- More ambitious (70% achievement counts as success)
- Separation of inspiration (Objective) and measurement (Key Results)
- Better alignment through cascading
When OKRs instead of SMART:
- When you need ambitious goals
- For team and company level
- For quarterly planning
HARD Goals
Acronym:
- Heartfelt – Emotionally meaningful
- Animated – Vividly imaginable
- Required – Necessary (not just "nice to have")
- Difficult – Challenging
Focus: Motivation and emotional connection instead of just measurement obsession.
WOOP
Method by Gabriele Oettingen:
- Wish – What do I wish for?
- Outcome – What would be the best result?
- Obstacle – What's stopping me?
- Plan – If [obstacle], then [reaction]
Especially good for: Personal goals and habit formation.
North Star Metric
Concept: A single metric that captures the core of company value.
Examples:
- Spotify: Time users spend listening to music
- Airbnb: Nights booked
- Slack: Daily active users
Advantage: Extreme focus and alignment.
When to Use SMART?
SMART works best for:
| Situation | Why SMART fits |
|---|---|
| Clearly defined projects | Scope is known, measurability easy |
| Operational goals | Day-to-day business, not innovation |
| Individual development goals | Personal, concrete improvements |
| Compliance goals | Must be exactly met |
| Short-term goals | Under 3 months horizon |
When to Avoid SMART?
| Situation | Why SMART is problematic |
|---|---|
| Innovation & Research | Results not plannable |
| Culture change | Not capturable in numbers |
| Long-term vision | Too granular for big goals |
| Complex environments | Too rigid for constant adaptation |
| Motivation is the focus | Too rational, not inspiring |
Using SMART Goals in Teams
Best Practices
1. Formulate together
- Don't dictate goals top-down
- Involve team in goal definition
- Increase ownership through participation
2. Review regularly
- Weekly check-in: On track?
- Monthly review: Adjustment needed?
- Quarterly retrospective: What did we learn?
3. Make public
- Transparency creates commitment
- Team board with all goals
- Progress visible to everyone
4. Celebrate and learn
- Celebrate achieved goals
- Analyze missed goals (don't punish)
- Document lessons learned
Avoiding Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Solution |
|---|---|
| Too many goals | Max 3-5 focused goals per quarter |
| Only outcome goals | Also define process goals |
| Set and forget | Schedule regular check-ins |
| Only top-down | Enable bottom-up goals |
| No flexibility | Allow adjusting goals when needed |
SMART Goals Template
For Individuals
GOAL: ________________________________
S – Specific:
What exactly? ________________________________
Who is involved? ________________________________
Where? ________________________________
Why important? ________________________________
M – Measurable:
Success indicator: ________________________________
Current state: ________________________________
Target value: ________________________________
A – Achievable:
Motivation (1-10): ____
What excites me about it? ________________________________
R – Relevant:
Resources available? □ Yes □ No
Obstacles: ________________________________
Solutions: ________________________________
T – Time-bound:
Deadline: ________________________________
Milestones:
- __________ by __________
- __________ by __________
- __________ by __________
For Teams
TEAM GOAL Q_/202_
OBJECTIVE (inspiring):
________________________________
SMART KEY RESULTS:
KR1: ________________________________
- Metric: __________
- Current: __________
- Target: __________
- Deadline: __________
- Owner: __________
KR2: ________________________________
[same structure]
KR3: ________________________________
[same structure]
DEPENDENCIES:
- We need from Team X: ________________________________
- We deliver to Team Y: ________________________________
RISKS:
- ________________________________
- ________________________________
CHECK-IN RHYTHM: □ Weekly □ Bi-weekly □ Monthly
Conclusion: SMART as a Tool, Not a Dogma
SMART goals are a useful tool – but just a tool. They work excellently for:
- Concrete, operational goals
- Personal development goals
- Projects with clear scope
They work less well for:
- Ambitious stretch goals
- Innovation and experiments
- Long-term visions
My recommendation:
- For personal goals: SMART or WOOP
- For team goals: OKRs with SMART Key Results
- For company goals: North Star + OKRs
The most important thing isn't the perfect method, but setting goals at all, writing them down, and reviewing them regularly. An imperfectly formulated goal that you pursue beats a perfect SMART goal sitting in a drawer.
Leading a team and wondering how to communicate goals motivationally? Our guide on Servant Leadership shows how you achieve better results through support rather than control.


